From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 20 9:37:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B6D37B406 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jud [12.33.164.6] by myrealbox.com with NetMail ModWeb Module; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:37:19 -0400 Subject: Re: Re: BBConf with QT3 From: "Jud" To: neuhauser@bellavista.cz Cc: dnelson@allantgroup.com, Freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:37:19 -0400 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: jud MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1024591039.70b60ffcjud@myrealbox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----Original Message----- From: Roman Neuhauser To: Jud Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:38:44 +0200 Subject: Re: BBConf with QT3 [snip] last time I used bbconf (winter) it didn't *require* Qt. you could run the configurator written in perl. but bbconf isn't really useful anyway. configuring blackbox directly (editing the config files) is too easy to justify using bbconf. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I agree that blackbox config files are easily edited. Was just curious to = give bbconf a try. Since I need QT3 for at least one other app (Psi), du= mping bbconf would not result in my getting rid of QT3. Jud To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message