From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 07:23:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A23016A41C; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from Neo-Vortex.net (203-173-58-65.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.173.58.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0EB43D48; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:23:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from localhost.Neo-Vortex.net (Neo-Vortex@localhost.Neo-Vortex.net [127.0.0.1]) by Neo-Vortex.net (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j517N10B052999; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:23:01 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:23:01 +1000 (EST) From: Neo-Vortex To: iampinetan@netscape.net In-Reply-To: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> Message-ID: <20050601171953.Y51985@Neo-Vortex.net> References: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The performances of OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.8-alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:23:04 -0000 On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 iampinetan@netscape.net wrote: > Mean Resp. Time (ms)/ Weighted Bandwidth (bps)/ Valid+Invalid connections/ Confirming Connections/ Throughput ops/sec > Apache(FreeBSD) 410.0 303272.69 300+0 50 761 > Apache(RHEL) 382.2 313600.49 300+0 56 765 > Apache(FreeBSD) 719.3 166083.41 600+0 0 771 > Apache(RHEL) 758.2 157416.85 600+0 0 769 > Apache(FreeBSD) 1077.7 110974.79 983+17 0 773 > Apache(RHEL) 1247.2 95514.28 989+11 0 750 Anyone care to explain why on FreeBSD (without OpenKeta) the preformance was lower than Linux for the 300 connection test although better for the 600 and 1000? (Just Curiosity) ~Neo-Vortex