From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 02:47:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028AD16A41F; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 02:47:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from delight.idiom.com (delight.idiom.com [216.240.32.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B368643D45; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 02:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by delight.idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438B221E0D2; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7N2lATD055844; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:47:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Message-ID: <430A8E2B.6040408@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:47:07 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050424 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borja Marcos References: <5FFDC44D-F094-4856-8FAC-4D14EB77B47A@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <5FFDC44D-F094-4856-8FAC-4D14EB77B47A@sarenet.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Subject: Re: IBM Active Protection System Approach X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 02:47:12 -0000 Borja Marcos wrote: >> I think this will need to be tailored to the exact type of "mishap" >> one wants to protect against. > > > I think that the main purpose of the shock detection system is to > allow data to be recovered from the disk in case the laptop is broken. > By parking the heads asap you can avoid damaging the plates with the head. > > At least that's what I read. The disk won't be necessary usable > after being dropped, but at least the plates should be readable. no, the aim is to detect the LACK of acceleration as the laptop goes into freefall. You have about 1/4 a second to get the heads in once you detect that you are falling. Quick by human standards but an eon in computer terms. > > In that case, priority number one would be a fast parking of the > head. However, it could lead to a worst-case data loss with softupdates > and the disk cache, isn't it? > > > > > Borja. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"