From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 15 06:22:10 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECF6147
 for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 06:22:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D111D38
 for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 06:22:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275)
 id 2BD847300A; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 07:25:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 07:25:02 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com>
Subject: Re: 'silent' kernel builds ?
Message-ID: <20131215062502.GA99699@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References: <20131215054529.GB99455@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
 <210A5B78-8220-499D-930E-F042A3DD4360@felyko.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <210A5B78-8220-499D-930E-F042A3DD4360@felyko.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: "current@freebsd.org Current" <current@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 06:22:10 -0000

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:53:30PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 14 Dec 2013, at 21:45, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I was trying to make buildkernel a bit quieter (just listing
> > the name of the file being compiled).
> > 
> > I hoped to modify the " .c.o: " rules in  share/sys.mk but apparently
> > kernel builds generate their own Makefile using definitions in
> > sys/conf/kern.pre.mk .
> > 
> > As a result, a patch like the one below gets most of the work done
> > (a few extra bits are necessary to mask the awk calls, and the
> > 'irregular' compiler invocations).
> > 
> > However I could not found the rule definition used to build modules,
> > any idea where to look ?
> 
> sys/conf/kmod.mk

... ok, which in turn ends up into share/sys.mk at least for the .c.o rule

> > And finally, is there interest in this feature ?
> 
> I think it would be nice to have, maybe enabled by default.  Does it still print the errors? I think so, but I'm not sure.

Yes it does print errors, just checked.

I am not worried about making it a default, POLA
probably suggests otherwise and it is simple to
control it through a make.conf or environment variable.

thanks
luigi