From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 13:31:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1754516A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:31:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B625943D45 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:31:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (andy@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7TDVfG9032029; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:31:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)i7TDVeRr032026; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:31:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:31:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Jun Kuriyama In-Reply-To: <7mllfz4qlj.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> Message-ID: <20040829093045.J5951@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <7mllfz4qlj.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Coming soon: default to Giant-free networking in 6.x (was: Running the network stack without Giant -- change in default coming (fwd)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:31:46 -0000 On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:54:31 +0000 (UTC), > Robert Watson wrote: >> There are components of IPv6 that are not MPSAFE, but they are >> sufficiently minor components that they will be relatively safe in most >> scenarios, and it's probably reasonable to leave them enabled by default. >> We're working on completing locking for those components. > > Does this mean all 5.3 box in my office will be required to set > debug.mpsafenet=0 (80% of in my office is running 5.2.1 and rest are > 4.10, with using IPv6 much)? :-) I think you might have glanced over the following line right at the top: "This evening I will commit several changes to the 6.x branch relating to..." Regards, Andy | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >