From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 18:05:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C14216A553 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CC543D73 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4B81A3C23; Tue, 2 May 2006 11:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A22C4515BB; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:05:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:05:57 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mike Jakubik Message-ID: <20060502180557.GA91762@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060502171853.GG753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <20060502172225.GA90840@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060502174429.GH753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <44579EE1.6010300@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44579EE1.6010300@rogers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 18:05:59 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:03:13PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: > >Hi! > > > >On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > =20 > >>>I think it's same problem as in thread "fsck_ufs locked in snaplk". > >>>Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? > >>> =20 > >>I think we've reproduced the problem, but it probably won't be fixed > >>before the release. Sorry, the bug reports came too late in the > >>release cycle. > >> =20 > > > >Imho, it's bad idea -- create release with so important bug. It's not > >coda, unionfs or something else. It's very useful. > >I think, postpone release for fix this issue -- more fine. > > =20 >=20 > Ditto, same thing with the recent nve fixes. Why release known broken=20 > code when there are tested patches available? Whats the worst that will= =20 > happen? It wont work? Thats already the case... What patches? If you're talking about the mpsafe quota patches, they don't address the deadlocks. Kris --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEV5+EWry0BWjoQKURAhcMAJ9exWDv7HJGH1wGmyXKAN8yn6IONgCgmdbl U8oLEAWs7jd3+nd8YazhbJQ= =4lEr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--