From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 10:22:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C2016A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:22:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [213.41.129.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F3443D31 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:22:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B047F73086; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:22:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 98370-05-2; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:22:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF7373085; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:22:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from 145.248.192.30 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel) by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:22:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <53269.145.248.192.30.1109240527.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:22:07 +0100 (CET) From: "Julien Gabel" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thilelli.net cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jpeg@thilelli.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:22:14 -0000 > That doesen't mean of course that it's impossible to do it - you can for > example use Solaris for a small company server - but the effort required > to go against the grain is much higher. Solaris for example comes with no > compiler and you must compile by hand all the applications you need, and > often you must recompile the complier just before you can even start > doing that. It takes days - whereas the FreeBSD ports system takes a few > hours for the largest and most complex packages. Just as a side notes here: 1/ Solaris does come with 'gcc' on Compagnion CD as can be seen on a fresh Solaris 10 installation: # pkginfo -l SUNWgcc | egrep "PKGINST|NAME|ARCH|VERSION|VENDOR|DESC" PKGINST: SUNWgcc NAME: gcc - The GNU C compiler ARCH: sparc VERSION: 11.10.0,REV=2005.01.08.05.16 VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc. DESC: GNU C - The GNU C compiler 3.4.3 2/ You can always use the pkgsrc (the NetBSD Packages Collection) as the FreeBSD ports system replacement for use on Sun Solaris. We do it here already for some software for Solaris 2.6, 8, 9 and soon for 10. I don't say i disagree with your global point of view, just that the last two points may be slightly... moderated :) -- -jpeg.