From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs  Sat Jan 25 16:40:52 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99D837B401
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ints.mail.pike.ru (ints.mail.pike.ru [195.9.45.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C01D43EB2
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:40:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from babolo@cicuta.babolo.ru)
Received: (qmail 18406 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2003 00:55:14 -0000
Received: from babolo.ru (HELO cicuta.babolo.ru) (194.58.226.160)
  by ints.mail.pike.ru with SMTP; 26 Jan 2003 00:55:14 -0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 9665 invoked by uid 136);
	Sun, 26 Jan 2003 00:42:20 -0000
Subject: Re: ports/46854: ports/lang/ruby/files/patch-defines.h includes RCS
 ids
X-ELM-OSV: (Our standard violations) hdr-charset=KOI8-R; no-hdr-encoding=1
In-Reply-To: <863cng6bvr.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 03:42:20 +0300 (MSK)
From: "."@babolo.ru
Cc: "."@babolo.ru, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <1043541740.202494.9664.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> At Sun, 26 Jan 2003 02:28:05 +0300 (MSK),
> "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> > What is the intention of this chunk:
> 
> Why should I have an intention?  Obviously it's part of what cvs diff
> produces.  It was handy for me as a port maintainer to just put a diff
> produced by cvs diff, and there was no problem with it.
Using ports tree as is without changes is not
the only model of use.
Propagation tweaked tree via cvs
can screw RCS Ids.
Yes you are free to not clean up diffs
from unnecessary chunks if want.
It is my wish only.

> > and can it be wiped out from patch-defines.h ?
> The whole patch was gone when I updated the port last night.
> 
> > Please.
> Now your configuration problem is hidden for a while.  Good for you..
Source tree modifications is configuration problem?
May be, may be...

Thank you very much


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message