From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 12:10:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B8616A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:10:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E540443D2D for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:10:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3ECARTh062826 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:10:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3ECARav062825; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:10:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:10:27 GMT Message-Id: <200504141210.j3ECARav062825@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: "Julien Gabel" Subject: Re: docs/79901: Incoherence of the recipient to whom to send a followup in the problem-reports article. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Julien Gabel List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:10:28 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/79901; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Julien Gabel" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/79901: Incoherence of the recipient to whom to send a followup in the problem-reports article. Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:02:45 +0200 (CEST) ------=_20050414140245_21354 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> The FreeBSD article 'problem-reports' says that there exists two methods >> to submit a followup: either use the followup link on the individual >> PR's web page, or just mail it to . I think >> the incoherence come from the fact that the @email found on the >> individual PR's web page actually is >> which is different than . > The bug-followup address is an alias for freebsd-gnats-submit. It doesn't > really matter which one you use. Ok, thank you for this subtlety :) >> Because i don't which email recipient is the good one (better one?), i >> don't know which of the two parts must be adjusted: the bottom part of >> individual PRs, or the problem-reports article. > I prefer the first one, since bug-followup@ is more friendly to us human > earthlings than some obscure gnats-dependent alias. The bug-followup > address is easier to remember, because it matches the functionality of > the alias (followup/reply to a bug report). So in this case, maybe that the very little attached patch will be enough to adjusts this point. Thanks. -- -jpeg. ------=_20050414140245_21354 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="query-pr.cgi.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="query-pr.cgi.patch" LS0tIHd3dy9lbi9jZ2kvcXVlcnktcHIuY2dpCUZyaSBOb3YgMjYgMjI6NTc6MjMgMjAwNAorKysg cXVlcnktcHIuY2dpCVRodSBBcHIgMTQgMTM6NDc6MTkgMjAwNQpAQCAtMTgwLDcgKzE4MCw3IEBA CiAkb3JpZ3N5biA9fiBzL1teYS16QS1aKy5ALV0vIiUiIC4gc3ByaW50ZigiJTAyWCIsIHVucGFj aygiQyIsICQmKSkvZWc7CiAkZW1haWwgPX4gcy9bXmEtekEtWisuQC1dLyIlIiAuIHNwcmludGYo IiUwMlgiLCB1bnBhY2soIkMiLCAkJikpL2VnOwogCi1wcmludCBxcWA8QSBIUkVGPSJtYWlsdG86 ZnJlZWJzZC1nbmF0cy1zdWJtaXRcQEZyZWVCU0Qub3JnLCR7ZW1haWx9P3N1YmplY3Q9UmU6JTIw JHtjYXR9LyR7bnVtYmVyfTolMjAkb3JpZ3N5biI+U3VibWl0IEZvbGxvd3VwPC9BPiB8IDxBIEhS RUY9Ii4vcXVlcnktcHIuY2dpP3ByPSRwciZhbXA7Zj1yYXciPlJhdyBQUjwvQT5cbmA7Citwcmlu dCBxcWA8QSBIUkVGPSJtYWlsdG86YnVnLWZvbGxvd3VwXEBGcmVlQlNELm9yZywke2VtYWlsfT9z dWJqZWN0PVJlOiUyMCR7Y2F0fS8ke251bWJlcn06JTIwJG9yaWdzeW4iPlN1Ym1pdCBGb2xsb3d1 cDwvQT4gfCA8QSBIUkVGPSIuL3F1ZXJ5LXByLmNnaT9wcj0kcHImYW1wO2Y9cmF3Ij5SYXcgUFI8 L0E+XG5gOwogCiBwcmludCAmaHRtbF9mb290ZXI7CiAK ------=_20050414140245_21354--