From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 10 22:48:27 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2871516A4CE; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:48:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 59D9043D2F; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:48:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (ip68-230-188-82.dc.dc.cox.net
	[68.230.188.82])	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2AMmPMp092586
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:48:25 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:48:18 -0500
From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050310174818.5e140484@mobile.pittgoth.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050310223603.GE607@nosferatu.blackend.org>
References: <200503101654.j2AGstaw065903@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20050310223603.GE607@nosferatu.blackend.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:48:27 -0000

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:36:04 +0100
Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:54:55PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > pav         2005-03-10 16:54:55 UTC
> > 
> >   FreeBSD doc repository (ports committer)
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml 
> >   Log:
> >   - X section
> >     * Replace question about how to compile XFree86 3.x app with XFree86-4
> >       libraries with a question how to install X.org when system defaults
> >       to XFree86-4 and vice versa.
> >   
>  
>        <qandaentry>
>          <question id="xfree86-version">
> -          <para>An X app I am building depends on &xfree86; 3.3.X, but I
> -          have &xfree86; 4.X installed. What should I do?</para>
> +          <para>I want to install different <application>X</application>
> +            server.</para>
>          </question>
> 
> You should not use application tags for the term "X" (server), it's not
> an application but more a "family".  For example you will not write
> <application>C compiler</application>, but
> <application>gcc</application> is correct.
> 
>          <answer>
> -          <para>To tell the port build to link to the &xfree86; 4.X libraries,
> -	  add the following to <filename>/etc/make.conf</filename>, (if you 
> -          do not have this file, create it):</para>
> -
> -	  <programlisting>XFREE86_VERSION=        4</programlisting>
> +          <para>&os; versions prior 5.3 will use the default &xfree86;
> +            4.X, while latter verions will default to &xorg;.
> +            If you want to run different <application>X</application>
> 
> Same thing here.  <application>&xfree86;&nbsp;</application> and
> <application>&xorg;</application> should also be used.
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-install.html
> 
> may be a good example on "X11 terms tagging."

This blame is all mine, not Pav's.  I asked him to use
application because I did not know we already had a standard
tag for it.

-- 
Tom Rhodes