From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 21 22:24:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76F437B401 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from straylight.ringlet.net (office.sbnd.net [217.75.140.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6A2443E4A for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:24:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 29640 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Oct 2002 05:24:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:24:05 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Linus Kendall Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PThreads problem Message-ID: <20021022052405.GD377@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Linus Kendall , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <1035200159.24315.13.camel@bilbo> <20021021124520.GS389@straylight.oblivion.bg> <1035206648.24315.20.camel@bilbo> <20021021134834.GA41198@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20021021135045.GB41198@straylight.oblivion.bg> <1035218026.24330.33.camel@bilbo> <20021021194453.GB377@straylight.oblivion.bg> <1035232308.24315.37.camel@bilbo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1035232308.24315.37.camel@bilbo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:31:48PM +0200, Linus Kendall wrote: [snip] >=20 > That was very thorough, thanks! Now I at least have a notion of what=20 > is going on. Since this is slightly urgent I guess a hack into the > libcurl source code to try to remove the sigalarms would do the trick > (in my case). In the general case it seems like there's a rather big > problem here as libcurl's behavior cannot really work together with the > FreeBSD implementation of threads. I wonder, though.. If libcurl depends on Linux-specific threads library behavior, what would the effects be if it were to be compiled against the devel/linuxthreads port? Maybe I will try building curl with linuxthreads later today.. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If the meanings of 'true' and 'false' were switched, then this sentence wou= ldn't be false. --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9tOD07Ri2jRYZRVMRAi4IAKC0XjrVxGjjMlBO3hiGcW66obj7zQCeJF3B czvp9SlfHVKpiiNqJrmlv+I= =1qsj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message