From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Apr 6 10: 3:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D993215214 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 10:03:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from faber@ISI.EDU) Received: from ISI.EDU (vex-e.isi.edu [128.9.160.240]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA23812; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199904061701.KAA23812@boreas.isi.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa Cc: Nate Williams , Nick Sayer , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any success with CirrusLogic 6729/6730??? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Apr 1999 12:17:19 +0900." <199904060317.MAA00779@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> X-Url: http://www.isi.edu/~faber Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 10:01:04 -0700 From: Ted Faber Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa wrote: >> It's a dirty world. How can I tell the difference between an >> uninitialized chip and one that the BIOS has initialized? >> I would be happy to use the BIOS values if I could identify them. > >For example, Chandra has two PCIC. One is RF5C296 that true ISA >PCIC, at 0x3e2. Another is TI PCI1130 that CardBus controller, at >0x3e4 for legacy mode. I had never heard of that arrangement, but I'll look into making my code work for it. Thanks. > >If multi PCIC exist and these are over two types, Ted's code not >work correct. It should be use BIOS setup for PnP, if it can. I agree in principle, but let me think about how to implement that. Suggestions are welcome, of course. > >> Also the 3.1 pcic code seems to always look for the card at >> PCIC_INDEX_0 (Nate, Nick, did I read that right?). I agree that it >> would be better to be more general, but I don't want to rewrite pcic.c. > >It should be modifiy ... like PAO. I feel uncomfortable about modifying that code without some indication from Nate, or our new chieftan Scott, that such a modification would be accepted. I really don't want to waste time on code that will never see the tree. I do think that setting up the pcic code to take a port at kernel config time is a reasonable thing to do. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ted Faber faber@isi.edu USC/ISI Computer Scientist http://www.isi.edu/~faber (310) 822-1511 x190 PGP Key: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNwo9z4b4eisfQ5rpAQEjsQQAmbaKgbq1YYwoYkd1+PyOh7zb8MNfPP/P q0Dg9h6piuJWr8d46ALbS532lFgHfRsDJ9Jxknz6hp6DihwGBXHA2ug16u2AxJ8o R9/6P4qjxIAKW5edKk5Eue6lsz+UxxihiZX0dVe7778O6DeLy8+yW9kXHnXkL7mP NOkmEV7bzUk= =si9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message