From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 23 9:35:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from guru.phone.net (guru.phone.net [209.157.82.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D1CB14C40 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:35:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwm@phone.net) Received: (qmail 21402 invoked by uid 100); 23 Mar 1999 17:34:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Mar 1999 17:34:53 -0000 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:34:53 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Meyer To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build of 3.1-STABLE failing? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 23 Mar 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Add the following line to /etc/make.conf: > > INSTALL=install -C Already covered... > > You mean - people who go in and edit the userland sources? Nuts - > > that's one of the reasons I *started* tracking -STABLE. I kept hoping > > the patches I submitted with pr bin/9429 would show up, as well as > > some of the ports I've done and submitted. > > Who are you paying to commit them? Nobody. That's why I said "hoping", and why I don't complain about it. I'm fully cognizant of the time & resource issues surrounding free software. > As it is, 9429 was committed on Sunday. Granted, it's not the best > turnaround time I've experienced, but it's a lot better than many > commercial Unix vendors. Yeah, my mentioning it here seems to have tickled jkh to go look at it :-).