From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 19:41:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D581216A41F; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:41:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (ns1.freebsdmall.com [69.50.233.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78E743D45; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:41:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id 926F61CE53; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:41:54 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Hiroki Sato Message-ID: <20050830194154.GD35225@freebsdmall.com> References: <1125401964.4959.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20050831.043516.71548826.hrs@allbsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050831.043516.71548826.hrs@allbsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, murray@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: abandoning jade X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:41:55 -0000 On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:35:16AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote > in <1125401964.4959.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>: > > pa> Why we do still stick with jade, when better faster happier openjade is > pa> available? If it's purely historical sentiment, isn't it time for a > pa> global switch to openjade? > > IIRC, Murray said that OpenJade had a problem on rendering > the handbook in printable format some years ago. > Murray, is it correct? If so, do you remember what the problem is? > If there is no longer the problem, I agree with switch to OpenJade. There have historically been lots of problems with OpenJade. Whoever wants to make the change should verify that PDF versions of all of our documents in the tree can build with OpenJade (and with/without index, etc..). If it works, great. Just because it is on a sourceforge page doesn't make it better maintained. Hardly anyone was working on it when I had a commit bit to the openjade sourceforge project. - Murray