From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 6 19:11:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C7316A4D4 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 19:11:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D2343D62 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 19:11:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1106.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 255281C000B2 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 21:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1106.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D19111C000AF for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 21:11:07 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050506191107860.D19111C000AF@mwinf1106.wanadoo.fr Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 21:11:07 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1889363326.20050506211107@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050506190447.GB9865@tikitechnologies.com> References: <20050506103934.10FA34BEAD@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <403456169.20050506125226@wanadoo.fr> <200505061204.22212.kirk@strauser.com> <1613098307.20050506204926@wanadoo.fr> <20050506190447.GB9865@tikitechnologies.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 19:11:09 -0000 Clifton Royston writes: > There are specific safe-harbor provisions for ISPs and > networks which are merely transiting and/or caching traffic. Hmm ... yes, my mistake, provided that nothing is actually stored on the networks in question. > I have to believe you've never actually implemented any of the > strategies and claims you're pontificating about. I haven't sent out any DMCAs thus far. > Of course, the best way to ensure you don't look bad in Google is to > try hard to post only intelligent questions and comments to mailing > lists - for example, by searching web archives of the mailing list or > employing common sense - and to post intelligent answers when you have > them. Not acting like a buffoon will go a long way on the Net. Of > course that may be just too hard for a few people. The only thing one really needs to avoid is personal attacks. -- Anthony