From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 14 03:44:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7191F16A4CF for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 03:44:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB2843D41 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 03:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from railmail@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so29744rnl for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.171.68 with SMTP id t68mr336683rne; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 23:44:49 -0400 From: Rail mail To: Chris In-Reply-To: <411D86A3.8080704@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <411D86A3.8080704@makeworld.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: updating issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 03:44:53 -0000 well I was thinking either I do binary updates or recompile updates. My first question started off with "can I get security fixes with out recompiling?". I knew about upgrade in sysinstall, but the word was that gets the release specified, not necessarily security fixes. So then I thought you have to recompile to get updates. But freebsd-update was then introduced to me. But It complained since we had to recompile the src for the release (5.1) to get certain features in the kernel. So I am still stuck with the question "can I get security fixes with out recompiling?". R. On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:27:31 -0500, Chris wrote: > > > Rail mail wrote: > > I have compiled kernel and now want to find easiest, safest way to > > upgrade a production machine. > > > > I'm trying to make a decision on to either A just always do a cvsup > > with RELENG_5_X and make world or B try to pull something together > > with freebsd-update. > > > > of course freebsd-update 1.4 gets upset since files were modified, due > > to src update and compile. > > I could be wrong but I thought the whole idea of FreeBSDUpdate is NOT to > mess with the source. I always thought that the before mentioned > updeated only the binaries. > > That being said, and if you did tamper with the source - then cvsup (to > me) is the proper course of action. > > -- > Best regards, > Chris > > Real programmers can do octal, hexadecimal and > binary math in their heads. >