From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 28 10:20:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C7837B420 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA6C43E75 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:20:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9SIK0rF074292; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:20:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Maksim Yevmenkin Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: options GEOM and NODEVFS In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:42:01 PST." <3DBD76E9.2F12196B@exodus.net> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:20:00 +0100 Message-ID: <74291.1035829200@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <3DBD76E9.2F12196B@exodus.net>, Maksim Yevmenkin writes: >the question is: are options GEOM and NODEVS compatible? No, they are not. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message