From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 16 22:05:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A861065675
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:05:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from carlson39@llnl.gov)
Received: from nspiron-1.llnl.gov (nspiron-1.llnl.gov [128.115.41.81])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144148FC13
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:05:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Attachments: None
Received: from bagua.llnl.gov (HELO [134.9.197.135]) ([134.9.197.135])
	by nspiron-1.llnl.gov with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2011 14:36:35 -0700
Message-ID: <4E73C163.9040601@llnl.gov>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:36:35 -0700
From: Mike Carlson <carlson39@llnl.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64;
	rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: PAM modules
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:05:01 -0000

On 09/16/2011 08:05 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of
> them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't.  I
> believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into
> base.  My question is: which ones?
>
> DES
LDAP support out of the box would be fantastic.

Mike C