From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 27 01:45:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D033408 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAC4E6 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081DCC943A for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:45:23 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:45:22 +0000 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD port for redirecting printer Message-ID: <20130227014522.2e8a2972@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20130226180645.GA1161@tiny.Sisis.de> <20130226183646.GA2351@tiny.Sisis.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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==== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:45:40 -0000 On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:37:22 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Wojciech Puchar < > > wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > > > >> at all cost. > >>>> > >>> > >>> But for this, CUPS is your best choice. > >>> > >> > >> Sorry i DO WANT SIMPLE THINGS. not overcomplex windows style > >> craps. thanks > >> > > > > Prining is NOT simple no matter what you might think. And what CUPS > > (Common UniX Print System) has to do with windows, I can't > > imagine. (It does share quite a bit with MacOS and Apple does own a > > lot of the code.) > > > > Unless you want to print to a very dumb printer, CUPS is almost > > certainly the simplest choice...vastly simpler than plain old > > lpd(8) and old, unmanageable printcaps(5) files. But it's your life > > and your system. > > Huh. My experience has been the opposite. CUPS is a huge blob of > complexity hiding behind a user interface that appears simple. > lpd(8) can be annoying, but works fine for this kind of use. I concur in this case. I have a Postscript-aware HP printer that also does PCL. The usual simple shell script filter to detect PostScript allows that to auto-adjust. printcap is easy, and I love chkprintcap - especially the -d option!