From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar  3 14:20:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6446316A4CE
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Mar 2004 14:20:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cliffclavin.cs.rpi.edu (cliffclavin.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.1.9])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B0443D2D
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Mar 2004 14:20:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu)
Received: from 128.213.12.18 (rexx.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.12.18])
	i23MKpn7018120
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:20:51 -0500 (EST)
From: "David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu>
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <11001.1078350671@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <11001.1078350671@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1078352449.454.14.camel@rexx.cs.rpi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date: 03 Mar 2004 17:20:51 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37
Subject: Re: struct buf * and journaled-UFS help
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:20:52 -0000

Well, I can agree with that.... Now, "how" do I get a struct buf *?

-- 
David E. Cross

On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 16:51, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20040304163927.5babadf9@kanpc.gte.com>, Alexander Kabaev writes:
> 
> >If you don't need any delwri functionality struct buf provides, I would
> >suggest using struct bio to route IO directly to storage drivers/geom.
> 
> No, nono! nonononoOOOOO!!!!
> 
> We do not want to maintain two I/O paths from one filesystem which
> already has it's laundry picked up in SPECFS.
> 
> UFS must stick to the buffer cache for now.