From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 21 13:41:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from manatee.mammalia.org (manatee.mammalia.org [216.231.50.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8E237BED0 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:41:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rjoseph@mammalia.org) Received: by manatee.mammalia.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D90E011CD28; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:41:24 -0700 From: R Joseph Wright To: j mckitrick Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BSDI netscape Message-ID: <20000721134124.A524@manatee.mammalia.org> References: <20000721131037.B85724@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000721131037.B85724@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org on Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:10:37PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:10:37PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote: > > Has anyone tried this port? Other than not needing a.out libraries, does > it have any advantages or cool features that are worth checking out, or is > it the same old netscape we've grown to love and hate? In my experience, it does the same "disappear from the screen at the most inopportune moment" trick that all the others do. Other than that, it's fine. But I think the Linux version has the most features in that it supports plugins. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message