From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 18 18:49:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF88216A4CE; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:49:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obelix.noxtension.com (obelix.noxtension.com [158.38.48.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0880743D45; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:49:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-threads@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obelix.noxtension.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4A11C668D; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:48:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obelix.noxtension.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (obelix.noxtension.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06610-03-69; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:48:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by obelix.noxtension.com (Postfix, from userid 97) id 3711F1C6F81; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:44:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obelix.noxtension.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45B31C703A for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:34:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obelix.noxtension.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (obelix.noxtension.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26993-04-89 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:34:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by obelix.noxtension.com (Postfix, from userid 97) id CFE461C66CB; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:05:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obelix.noxtension.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09771C68E8 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:33:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obelix.noxtension.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (obelix.noxtension.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07938-01-32 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:33:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by obelix.noxtension.com (Postfix, from userid 97) id E93D41C68E6; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:34:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obelix.noxtension.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4E21C7CB8 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:37:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obelix.noxtension.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (obelix.noxtension.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30307-05 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:37:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by obelix.noxtension.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26761C7CB5 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:37:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53DD572A7; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:37:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-threads@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C4316A4D7; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:37:42 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725F316A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:37:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmsrelay03.mx.net (cmsrelay03.mx.net [165.212.11.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6F1743D2F for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:37:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from uadvg130.cms.usa.net (165.212.11.130) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 17 Jun 2004 06:35:44 -0000 Received: from optimator.noacks.org [70.240.243.152] by uadvg130.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/noackjr@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.13N) with ESMTP id 825iFqgjQ0291M30; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:35:41 GMT X-USANET-Auth: 70.240.243.152 AUTH noackjr@usa.net optimator.noacks.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0216134; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:35:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08574-05; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:35:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBFF617E; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:35:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5H6ZZBg067028; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:35:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <40D13BB6.3020709@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:35:34 -0500 From: Jon Noack User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040531) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Knowles References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at noacks.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at obelix.noxtension.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at obelix.noxtension.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at obelix.noxtension.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at obelix.noxtension.com cc: mike cc: Robert Watson cc: Julian Elischer cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible Threading problem with -CURRENT / MySQL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:49:25 -0000 On 06/17/04 01:07, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 1:31 AM -0400 2004-06-17, Robert Watson wrote: >> - Removing Giant from UNIX domain sockets > > Out of curiosity, is this something that could be relatively safely > done in general? Any ideas on what the plan is for doing this as the > default on -CURRENT? Wasn't this already done? See this commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-June/025082.html >> - Disabling HTT - Using ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES > > These both sound like typical improvements, based on what I've seen > on this list. Any ideas on when they might become the default? ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES was already enabled by default on amd64. See this commit (read thread for discussion): http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-June/025234.html It appears no comprehensive testing has been done to check whether it really does improve performance. Many signs do point that way, though. >> - Running with SCHED_4BSD instead of SCHED_ULE > > This is the only one that really concerns me. This shows that we > clearly need more work on ULE. Is there one particular thing that we > seem to be tripping up on, or is it a multitude of things? I think I'll switch to 4BSD until I see more work being done on ULE (I read cvs-src as a hobby already so I'll know when to switch back). I noticed a performance drop from 5.2.1-p8 (with 4BSD) to -CURRENT (with ULE) when I upgraded, but I attributed it to other things. However, the system still feels slower than before despite having since disabled INVARIANTS, WITNESS, and userspace malloc debugging flags. Jon Noack _______________________________________________ freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"