From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 9 15:42:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E1D16A409; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDD813C4A6; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBDF209641; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:42:41 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mcVGgdvxxby1; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:42:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [10.0.5.16]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E4A2090DE; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:42:35 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:42:35 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser To: Divacky Roman In-Reply-To: <20070209145839.GB62204@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20070209145839.GB62204@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> X-Priority: 5 (Lowest) Message-ID: <30dc9f35e8a99caa9d40d99132b8246c@strauser.com> X-Sender: kirk@strauser.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird perms with linux_base-gentoo-stage3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:42:42 -0000 On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:58:39 +0100, Divacky Roman wrote: > just out of curiousity - what do you mean by "better then the recommended > fc4" ? what problems disappear with you switch to gentoo base? Well, the short answer is that with the Gentoo base, some of the proprietary applications we use will run, while under FC4, they'd either fail to load or have horrible OpenGL problems (like poor performance or bad displays). I installed the Gentoo base as a test and the programs instantly started working again. It may not be recommended for various reasons that I haven't really researched, but it does what we need. -- Kirk Strauser