From owner-cvs-all Sun Dec 27 21:12:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA22049 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:12:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA22044 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:12:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA14387; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:12:08 -0800 (PST) To: Mike Smith cc: Warner Losh , committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The recent fracas involving danes, war axes and wounded developers In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:05:58 PST." <199812280505.VAA07578@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:12:07 -0800 Message-ID: <14383.914821927@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I don't like this; it grants any single core member power of veto, and > that's a current problem with our system already. I could see changing it to a majority vote, but not much less stringent than that. Remember, this is about *removing* stuff and the historical propensity for our users to scream bloody murder when the furby driver, committed by a demented developer at 3am while under the influence of 7 bottles of cough syrup, is taken out. We want to make it just a little harder than normal to remove existing functionality. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message