From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 05:50:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C9116A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 05:50:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp02.net-yan.com (smtp02.hgcbroadband.com [210.0.255.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF2643D5E for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 05:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam.wun@authtec.net) Received: (qmail 36756 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 05:50:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.4.129]) (samwun@hgcbroadband.com@[221.127.106.232]) (envelope-sender ) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Sep 2004 05:50:21 -0000 Message-ID: <413FEE0F.6070302@authtec.net> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:45:51 +0800 From: sam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max Laier References: <413BE6CC.9010200@authtec.net> <20040907175400.GD17387@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <200409080000.58832.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200409080000.58832.max@love2party.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 11:47:30 +0000 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF+CARP is not yet migrated to Beta53 - some testing tools X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 05:50:25 -0000 Max Laier wrote: >On Tuesday 07 September 2004 19:54, Brooks Davis wrote: > > >>On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:25:48PM +0800, sam wrote: >> >> >>>I just found that PF CARP is not yet migrated to Beta53. >>>At the mement, I will have to apply CARP patches to the src manually >>>after installed Beta53. >>>I think I will still rely on my own release of FreeBSD53 to enable >>>PF+CARP for the time being.... >>> >>> >>Yes, that's correct. The ABI changes required by CARP were made, but >>it was deemed that there wasn't time to actually implement CARP before >>5.3. It should be in 5.4. >> >> > >I hope that I have enough time to polish it for 5.4 - no chance for 5.3 (I >think I said that whenever posting patches). Help testing! Provide feedback! > >Thanks! > > > Hi, I would like to commit to the testing. I recently purchased few P4 machines. They will be used for the testing of the PF+PFSYNC+CARP stuff. One thing I am still looking for is some testing tools. Do you have any suggestion about which tools I can use to test the load balancing and redundancy control in this particular case? Thanks Sam