From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 25 19:13:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F6716A4CE; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:13:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F12243D6D; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id E9085530C; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:11:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 47F26530A; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:11:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id F2C7BB86C; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:11:37 +0200 (CEST) To: "Liam J. Foy" References: <20040625104502.16C027303F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040625162945.5f67d584.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> <20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:11:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> (Liam J. Foy's message of "Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:35:03 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: i386@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: tinderbox@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:13:56 -0000 "Liam J. Foy" writes: > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote: > > "Liam J. Foy" writes: > > > I think this should solve the problem, correct me if am wrong. =3D) > > No, that just shoves it under the carpet. > Maybe you could explain why ? Just look at the code. What the warning is really telling you is that you may be using the value of v from a previous loop iteration. Initializing v to 0 before the loop shuts up the warning, but doesn't actually stop the code from using an incorrect value of v. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no