From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 9 22:19:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from netrinsics.com (unknown [210.74.172.223]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EA614EFC for ; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 22:18:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robinson@netrinsics.com) Received: (from robinson@localhost) by netrinsics.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id NAA14698 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:16:50 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from robinson) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:16:50 +0800 (CST) From: Michael Robinson Message-Id: <199906100516.NAA14698@netrinsics.com> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Missing 3.2-RELEASE tag in anoncvs In-Reply-To: <199906091802.CAA10341@netrinsics.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm trying to get 3.2-RELEASE kernel source to patch with the latest PAO. Could any cvs gurus confirm that these two formulations are basically equivalent? cvs co -rRELENG_3_2_0_RELEASE src/sys cvs co -rRELENG_3 -D "1999-05-14 20:00" src/sys Thanks. -Michael Robinson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message