From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 31 08:27:21 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 25DF01065675; Sat, 31 May 2008 08:27:21 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:27:21 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20080531082720.GA96134@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200805292137.m4TLbovR008617@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20080530092620.GA11389@FreeBSD.org>
	<1212139911.77420.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1212139911.77420.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/vegastrike-data Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:27:21 -0000

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:31:51AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v p? 30. 05. 2008 v 09:26 +0000:
> > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 09:37:50PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > pav         2008-05-29 21:37:50 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     games/vegastrike-data Makefile 
> > >   Log:
> > >   - Disallow this from pointyhat builds; we don't need to repackage 520 MB of
> > >     game data and load it on all our mirrors
> > 
> > Why not follow the way it's done in e.g. games/nexuiz port and alike??
> > Looks like it gives more control to user.
> 
> This will not affect end-users in any way. PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined
> in and _only_ in pointyhat environment.
> 
> End users can still `make package' and all that. Unless I'm missing
> something?

Ah, OK, so if I simply want to prevent building what can be called
"official" package (which will be put on ftp.freebsd.org and mirrors), I
should check for PACKAGE_BUILDING and set IGNORE (or maybe NO_PACKAGE is
better?).  If there is some inherent problem with building a package
(not just to reduce payload on our DVDs), like legal issues with the
software, I just use NO_PACKAGE.  Am I getting this right?

./danfe