From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 22 13:15:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E6037B422 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 01E781C41; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:15:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:15:45 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Brett Glass Cc: Drew Derbyshire , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall DOESN'T ASK, dangerous defaults! Message-ID: <20000922161545.G34501@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <39CB4C42.1A59669C@kew.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20000922121808.00c7cc30@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000922121808.00c7cc30@localhost>; from brett@lariat.org on Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 12:22:00PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 12:22:00PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > >Most people also want a secure system. Don't even get me started about > >rlogin/rsh being on by default in /etc/inetd.conf. > > That's a change that should be committed YESTERDAY. All in favor? rlogin/rsh aren't always insecure. people's usage of them often are. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message