From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Jul 16 10:48:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9C114D80 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 10:48:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id TAA87133; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 19:48:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , maury@OAAI.COM, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Source control packages References: <199907151816.NAA11987@free.pcs> <19990716124302.45822@right.PCS> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 16 Jul 1999 19:48:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: Jonathan Lemon's message of "Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:43:02 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jonathan Lemon writes: > On Jul 07, 1999 at 06:53:55PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Jonathan Lemon writes: > > > Nobody really seems to like CVS. However, all the alternatives seem > > > to be either 1. worse, or 2. commercial. > > You forget: 3. free, slightly better, and in beta, and 4. free, really > > cool, but still in the design phase (with a prototype approaching). > Which ones? I did notice that someone (you?) made a passing reference > to another system, but I don't know anything about it. 3. refers to BitKeeper, 4. refers to OVCS. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message