From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 08:32:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06035EAA for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D27B2B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.49.41.220]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LtVLE-1X6zlo0Xgq-010xog for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:32:44 +0100 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8075223DA2F for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:32:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <53201BA9.2020105@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:32:41 +0100 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's up with pkg-fallout? References: <531FBD31.9060300@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <531FBD31.9060300@missouri.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7f8hjeUGtF08AChrU+CdiUtYwq0vMW3BytNc99t2lNzjZGI0mPY sVurdhzRAv7LVvRQDA0gLZ8M23HqWIrS6sdQd//Uc6cOHXR6Jhp0cyV4ZDYVue5bpiiExdD yYi7pTSgFfUpKsLVdOuFGfdCEjZqba5M1GzOlWDH6a0YHmKDRt/gyfRpibU9K3OBEsWKv1v Fz5Kw3ytodqFwhkbmpshA== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:32:52 -0000 Am 12.03.2014 02:49, schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen: > I keep getting emails from pkg-fallout@ that some of my ports are > faulty. But it is obvious that pkg-fallout sometimes uses a really old > ports trees. And the errors it is reporting have been fixed weeks ago. Also, if one looks at it looks rather implausible to me. Meaning that: 10i386 complains about undeclared free() and malloc(), but 10amd64 does not complain, and looking at the sources, I find the compiler errors implausible. I also cannot reproduce the problem on 10.0-RELEASE at home, so I believe that the fallout 10i386 builder is broken in some way at least for C++ ports. Please someone investigate.