From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 26 14:59:47 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7E47F2
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 149FA22FD
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6QExkah031079
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:59:46 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 191750] archivers/xz -> 5.0.5, MAINTAINERSHIP, MIRROR
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:59:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-191750-13-hp7JZ7OVBC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-191750-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-191750-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:59:47 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191750

John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bapt@FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |marino@FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |naddy@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #4 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
bapt, naddy, 
what do you think about jharris' case given that you two were involved with the
port removal?

He has a good point about featuring bzip and bzip2 so why not xz? especially if
it provides functionality not provided in base.

He probably should have stayed away from the wisecrack, but the rest of his
argument is somewhat persuasive.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.