From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Aug 17 03:19:39 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA13192 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 17 Aug 1996 03:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA13185 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 1996 03:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from baloon.mimi.com (sjx-ca55-21.ix.netcom.com [206.214.106.117]) by dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA26905; Sat, 17 Aug 1996 03:18:31 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by baloon.mimi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id DAA00887; Sat, 17 Aug 1996 03:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 03:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199608171018.DAA00887@baloon.mimi.com> To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com CC: obrien@Nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Klemm on Thu, 15 Aug 1996 20:28:23 +0200 (MET DST)) Subject: Re: Ports explosion From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > I think it's a good change, it makes it easier for us to test an * > upgrade (when the patches disapear due to an upgrade, the patches/ * > directory will still exist but you can't delete it because cvs will * > complain at checkout, etc....). * * Ok, agreed, no demand to be too picky here ;) Ok, I just committed the patch I sent out yesterday. People please try it without the -P flag to cvs co or update. :> Satoshi