From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Dec 15 12:34:54 2000
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 15 12:34:53 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEB637B400
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:34:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id eBFKYp722492;
	Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:34:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:34:50 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Peter Brezny <peter@sysadmin-inc.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: named, _sandbox_ and chroot?
Message-ID: <20001215123450.W19572@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <002801c066ef$415e7460$46010a0a@sysadmininc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <002801c066ef$415e7460$46010a0a@sysadmininc.com>; from peter@sysadmin-inc.com on Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:32:13PM -0800
Sender: bright@fw.wintelcom.net
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

* Peter Brezny <peter@sysadmin-inc.com> [001215 12:33] wrote:
> If you are running named in a sand box, is it advisable to run it in a
> chrooted enviroment as well?
> 
> Why or why not?

Generally a "sandbox" is within a chrooted envoirnment.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message