From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 22 20:55:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9596E106564A for ; Fri, 22 May 2009 20:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f106.google.com (mail-px0-f106.google.com [209.85.216.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E288FC18 for ; Fri, 22 May 2009 20:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: by pxi4 with SMTP id 4so1774024pxi.3 for ; Fri, 22 May 2009 13:55:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:received :message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :importance; bh=xkJDu+a06amfQlNY6XqdlN+IjKTWmZ+ayjHz/T3hECc=; b=ARp0yZ8CxMVZDIPrXuTeybST1gkWDyEov1gGjKtlNH/MW8JvHvK9rL/E9Et0H+ScDP Ush3z0iuCLuGki0WAjaMc41RmUUsWry7ZPI2o5ugwpJ+gtbQQXm2QZ5+kypby4gJNdOw 8a3T/UeJcNZisISO2+dcwAj4hy+daadQwcJy4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; b=sTl617fCP2hs10EpwFP99fv29cV8CHXBUNnBLc/wSHJABRKMMjkRKm6Bb7xYuCxsMW o1KqaHFXNYnsjTrEXs3MJnbAk1UWWDyYYhrEKh4eJ0egDyv9uLIiEbL2FEJ3L5N08UBS IZce+uZLVMzDxzzRJbkiM1Bvth8KuM0uoGc7w= Received: by 10.115.110.15 with SMTP id n15mr8651454wam.16.1243025705976; Fri, 22 May 2009 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com ([189.71.14.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l28sm809822waf.54.2009.05.22.13.55.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 22 May 2009 13:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 8CA60B8143; Fri, 22 May 2009 17:54:56 -0300 (BRT) Received: from 10.1.1.80 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus) by 10.1.1.10 with HTTP; Fri, 22 May 2009 17:54:56 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <8b8495f28364f457eebb2262fdae7e03.squirrel@10.1.1.10> In-Reply-To: <4A14956E.2040608@acm.poly.edu> References: <726e1882eb2ec94370bfec1666ec20f2.squirrel@10.1.1.10> <200905201227.46674.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4a36be1c432cfacf71ffa75ce3abbdd0.squirrel@10.1.1.10> <4A14956E.2040608@acm.poly.edu> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 17:54:56 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: is my slow for this ? hostap related X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 20:55:06 -0000 On Wed, May 20, 2009 20:42, Boris Kochergin wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> On Wed, May 20, 2009 07:27, Mel Flynn wrote: >> >>> Hi Nenhum, >>> >>> On Monday 18 May 2009 01:08:09 Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I have an atheros wlan card: >>>> >>>> ath0@pci0:0:11:0: class=0x020000 card=0x3a131186 chip=0x0013168c >>>> rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >>>> vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.' >>>> device = 'AR5212, AR5213 802.11a/b/g Wireless Adapter' >>>> class = network >>>> subclass = ethernet >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> May 17 13:19:36 floyd kernel: ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss >>>> count >>>> 4) >>>> May 17 13:20:07 floyd last message repeated 89 times >>>> May 17 13:22:08 floyd last message repeated 376 times >>>> >>>> I've read this: >>>> >>>> http://www.nabble.com/ath0:-stuck-beacon--resetting-(bmiss-count-4)-td22359 >>>> 155.html >>>> >>>> and I'm thinking my pc is slow for the job, as said. >>>> >>>> floyd# cat dmesg.today >>>> Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. >>>> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, >>>> 1994 >>>> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >>>> FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >>>> FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Tue May 5 23:08:28 BRT 2009 >>>> root@floyd.apartnet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Floyd8 >>>> WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. >>>> >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> >>> Read /usr/src/UPDATING about WITNESS options and which to delete from >>> GENERIC >>> >> >> I did, both read and recompile ... no good. >> >> I put: >> ral0@pci0:0:11:0: class=0x028000 card=0x3a711186 chip=0x03021814 >> rev=0x00 >> hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Ralink Technology, Corp' >> device = 'RT2525 2.4GHz transceiver + RT2560 MAC/BBP wireless >> a/b' >> class = network >> >> on there, no good also. is slow in the beginning, and then dies forever. >> >> I tried on a 950MHz duron and got the same results (atheros card only). >> unfortunately I can't test this duron anymore as it died from bad PSU. >> >> what made atheros happy was a Core 2 Duo, 2.66GHz at work. faster >> downloads and no even one of those lines :( >> >> too bad I just have an AthlonXP I can use as AP :( >> and soekris in future would be a way, now I think is slow as well ... >> >> thanks, >> >> matheus >> >> >>> kernel. I think once you turn those options off, your machine should be >>> able >>> to handle this, though I wouldn't run anything else on it. On a single >>> 1.8Ghz >>> 686, I got these occasionally, when backups were done over gigabit and >>> a >>> movie >>> was playing on it. I've since reconfigured the machine as dedicated >>> media >>> server and replaced the router with a headless 3Ghz 686, also running >>> squid. >>> This is overkill for my home network, though. >>> -- >>> Mel >>> >>> >> >> >> > I don't think your CPU is at fault. While I don't have any Crusoes, I > have several machines, ranging from Pentiums running at 200 MHz to > Pentium IIIs running at 933 MHz, with AR5212 cards in them. They run > 7.0-, 7.1-, and 7.2-RELEASE. While I do get some "stuck beacon" and > "device timeout" messages on them, they can all push at least 2 MB/s on > the AR5212 cards, and I am assuming that your Crusoe is faster than a > Pentium 200. > > -Boris well, there is some magic in this. as I do agree they are faster (at least the time to compile world + kernel is about half of my PII 333MHz). but I just got it running on the Core 2. crusoe just last some minutes, and stuck beacons do take over :( if anyone have any idea, of other things that could have to do with this. thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style