From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Mar 15 11:04:06 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA15524
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 15 Mar 1998 11:04:06 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from sendero.simon-shapiro.org (sendero-fddi.Simon-Shapiro.ORG [206.190.148.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA15469
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 1998 11:03:32 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from shimon@sendero-fxp0.simon-shapiro.org)
Received: (qmail 23376 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Mar 1998 19:08:21 -0000
Message-ID: <XFMail.980315110821.shimon@simon-shapiro.org>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3-alpha-030698 [p0] on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980315125918.22790C-100000@mamba.cs.Virginia.EDU>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 11:08:21 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: shimon@simon-shapiro.org
Organization: The Simon Shapiro Foundation
From: Simon Shapiro <shimon@simon-shapiro.org>
To: Adrian Filipi-Martin <adrian@virginia.edu>
Subject: Re: Best IDSN?
Cc: FreeBSD Questions List <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        Virgil Champlin <champlin@virgil.pa.dec.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On 15-Mar-98 Adrian T. Filipi-Martin wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Virgil Champlin wrote:
> 
>> >>   Can anyone suggest a good ISDN TA?  I am leaning towards an
>> >> internal Courier I or a Sporster ISDN?  Should I be looking at
>> >> anything else?
>> 
>> I've had very good luck with the Motorola Bitsurfr Pro.  Both with Win95
>> clients dialing in and FreeBSD boxes peering.  -virgil
> 
>       Are you using an internal model?  Is there an advantage to the
> Bitsurfer Pro?  I could find few references to models in use when
> searching the mailing list archives.  The Sportster seemed to be one of
> the fist mentioned. 

I belive there is an internal version, althogh I do not know what the
advantage of tat will be.  As long as it appears to the system as an sio
class device.

I am using an external one with 230,400 baud rate rather well for several
years.  Never had one fail, or mulfunction in any way.

Simon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message