From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 7 09:50:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7FE16A4D8 for ; Sat, 7 May 2005 09:50:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6177443D5D for ; Sat, 7 May 2005 09:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j479o6MR072949 for ; Sat, 7 May 2005 09:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j479o6ja072948; Sat, 7 May 2005 09:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 09:50:06 GMT Message-Id: <200505070950.j479o6ja072948@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Pav Lucistnik Subject: Re: docs/80681: articles/problem-reports: don't tell people they should sumbit a PR each time they see an outdated port X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pav Lucistnik List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 09:50:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/80681; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Cc: David Adam , FreeBSD gnats submit , freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/80681: articles/problem-reports: don't tell people they should sumbit a PR each time they see an outdated port Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 11:41:53 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu p=ED=B9e v so 07. 05. 2005 v 12:22 +0300: > > I propose that this patch be shortened to: > >=20 > > --- article.sgml.orig 2005-01-15 10:16:42.000000000 +0800 > > +++ article.sgml 2005-05-07 15:07:06.622424000 +0800 > > @@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ > > Notification of updates to externally maintained > > software (mainly ports, but also externally maintained base > > system components such as BIND or various GNU > > - utilities). > > + utilities). If you are reporting a new version of a > > + port, try contacting the port's maintainer first. > > > > >=20 > At least this could be committed. That, or just kill the whole paragraph. Or tell people to submit patch for updating the port with their PR. (Obviously this don't apply to base.) You could also tell people to search GNATS for PRs containing the update before sending any mail. --=20 Pav Lucistnik Linux is a happy free-for-all chaos.