From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Apr 6 10:13:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19EF15677 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 10:13:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA23215; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 11:11:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA16507; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 11:11:29 -0600 Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 11:11:29 -0600 Message-Id: <199904061711.LAA16507@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ted Faber Cc: Nate Williams , NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa , Nick Sayer , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any success with CirrusLogic 6729/6730??? In-Reply-To: <199904061709.KAA24369@boreas.isi.edu> References: <199904061703.LAA16410@mt.sri.com> <199904061709.KAA24369@boreas.isi.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >> I do think that setting up the pcic code to take a port at kernel > >> config time is a reasonable thing to do. > > > >You wouldn't get any argument from anyone, but how to do it? Making the > >PCIC an ISA device is unacceptable, > > That was my first thought. Why is it unacceptable? (I just don't > know, and it may help me come up with a better idea.) Because as you can tell, the PCIC code is *NOT* ISA specific. It's ISA-like, but not ISA specific. The code has no ISA code in it, except to deal with ISA devices (if it does, it should be removed). Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message