From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 26 09:09:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C876616A4CE for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 09:09:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA99143D5A for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 09:09:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 5A9779C; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:09:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from [128.2.138.17] (VPN17.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.138.17]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1EB86; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:08:46 -0500 (EST) From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: jaime@snowmoon.com In-Reply-To: <20031226120047.W79423@malkav.snowmoon.com> References: <20031226120047.W79423@malkav.snowmoon.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072458503.22319.2.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:08:23 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-38.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uname weirdness after kernel/OS update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:09:24 -0000 On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 12:05, jaime@snowmoon.com wrote: > I was previously running 4.9-PRERELEASE. I used cvsup to download > new source code and compile the OS, as I've done many times over the years > that I've used FreeBSD. Now, uname -a will show me 4.9-PRERELEASE and Aug > 26, 2003 instead of 4.9-RELEASE or 4.9-STABLE and any of the December > dates that I've attempted to compile a new kernel. At a guess, you put stuff in your supfile to hold the "src-all" collection at the August version, possibly due to the instability from the PAE changes that hit in August and were patched around then. Check your supfile. -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH