From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 14 18:24:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D441065670 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (marcuscom-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::1279]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509118FC08 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o1EIPDEM048110; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:25:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Andrew Reilly In-Reply-To: <201002141111.o1EBBXEP059502@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201002141111.o1EBBXEP059502@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JkEKgp8C3r9i9sKX3opK" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:25:02 -0500 Message-ID: <1266171902.3346.99.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/143852: port devel/seed fails because freshly built seed segfaults X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:24:59 -0000 --=-JkEKgp8C3r9i9sKX3opK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 11:11 +0000, Andrew Reilly wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/143852; it has been noted by GNA= TS. >=20 > From: Andrew Reilly > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, areilly@bigpond.net.au > Cc: =20 > Subject: Re: ports/143852: port devel/seed fails because freshly built se= ed > segfaults > Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:54:28 +1100 >=20 > Found it. > =20 > Executing seed failed because src/.libs/seed (which is what was > executed by the shell script on the failing line) was linked > against /usr/local/lib/seed.so.?, rather than the freshly built > (one assumes) one. The already installed one was crashing > becuase it was (indirectly) linked against libjpeg.so.10, but > that had ceased to exist because libjpeg had just been upgraded. > =20 > Resolution: de-installing seed before building made the new > executable link against the new library, and all was well. There is actually a bug in seed in amd64 with regard to missing sentinels. I fixed it upstream, and it is fixed in seed 2.29. Basically, seed is useless on amd64 right now, but it will work in GNOME 2.30. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-JkEKgp8C3r9i9sKX3opK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkt4P/wACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4cPMwCfYpXlfi7lTW35DTUkTRpZcibS a4EAnj6LaTCjhZ3AO3YGjfAR8gNRKs4B =Fe/o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-JkEKgp8C3r9i9sKX3opK--