From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 9 8:30:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dayspring.firedrake.org (dayspring.firedrake.org [195.82.105.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF7E37BDEB for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:30:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from float@firedrake.org) Received: from float by dayspring.firedrake.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13MXnC-0000rl-00; Wed, 09 Aug 2000 16:29:18 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:29:18 +0100 From: void To: Mitja Horvat Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE problem writing to async mounted filesystem Message-ID: <20000809162918.A3293@firedrake.org> References: <200008091038.MAA03452@akira.hermes.si> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200008091038.MAA03452@akira.hermes.si>; from mitja.horvat@hermes.si on Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:35:11PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:35:11PM +0200, Mitja Horvat wrote: > > As I understand SU, it's just a method to do metadata asynchronously in a > safe way, > so using noasync with SU does still have a point? "Using noasync" is a no-op; noasync is the default. -- Ben 220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message