From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 4 13:26:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C43A16A41F for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (ntweb04.msdihosting.net [66.199.153.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1247843D68 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:26:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id B3Q02104; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:26:43 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051104082348.04a27dd0@pop.msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:26:16 -0500 To: Kris Kennaway From: Ian Lord In-Reply-To: <20051104083850.GA17364@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051103225321.0252cc58@pop.msdi.ca> <20051104083850.GA17364@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug ?: SCHED_4BSD VS SCHED_ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:26:26 -0000 Sorry about the rc.conf mistake, I should sleep more at night instead of typing stupidities :) I was meaning /usr/src/sys/amd64/config/MYKERNEL I am running freebsd 5.4 amd64 version Should there be a big improvement from running ULE ?, nobody reported the bug I have with it ? Thanks At 03:38 2005-11-04, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:58:58PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am running amd64 version on a Dell 2850 Dual Xeon processor with emt64 > > > > as soon as I turn on SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD in rc.conf, the > > system starts to behave strangely. > > > > During boot, named and sshd can't start normally, system is unstable, etc > > > > Is that a known bug or isnt it suppose to work anyway on this kind of > > system ? > >You forgot to mention what version of FreeBSD you're running. Also, >you don't control the scheduler from rc.conf, it's compiled into your >kernel. > >Anyway, SCHED_ULE is better on 6.0 than on previous releases, but it's >still not officially supported, and there are some known problems with >it. > >Kris >