From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 15 10:56:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA06351 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:56:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (s205m64.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA06344 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:56:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA09043; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:39:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhw) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:39:28 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199812151839.KAA09043@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: ambrisko@whistle.com, dillon@apollo.backplane.com Subject: Re: bin/8183 Cc: dhw@whistle.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, thompson@gateway.tgsoft.com In-Reply-To: <199812151830.KAA59036@apollo.backplane.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:30:08 -0800 (PST) >From: Matthew Dillon >:Note I applied this "fix" to my -current machine and now Amanda won't work. >:It complains about bad packets. Note it uses UDP. Without this change >:we didn't have this problem only that after 5 days inetd claimed it >:can exec it. Killing and restarting inetd doesn't help. Running the >:old one does. >:I can try some fixes etc. but I may not be able to try them much in the >:next to weeks and I may be away from email a couple of days. I can handle simple things like discussing the configuration some, though I don't change Doug's machine much.... (I have root access, but I try to be non-intrusive.) > Amanda? The tape backup system? What is the inetd control line you > are using? More information is needed... Information? We got that, no problem: pau-amma[1]% rsh crab 'tail -1 /etc/inetd.conf' amanda dgram udp wait operator /usr/local/libexec/amanda/amandad amandad FYI, it's the same line that works OK (for a while) with the old inetd. Symptoms Doug & I noted this AM (with patched inted) included amandad whining about dup[licate] packets, and the amandad process hanging around far beyond a reasonable approximation of its useful(? -- especially given that all it was doing is whining) life. Should -hackers be on the addressee list on this? david -- David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator dhw@whistle.com voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (650) 371-4621 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message