From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 15 11:07:38 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id LAA29592 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 15 Feb 1995 11:07:38 -0800 Received: from rachael.franken.de (rachael.franken.de [131.188.40.80]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA29583; Wed, 15 Feb 1995 11:07:22 -0800 Received: from pizza by rachael.franken.de with uucp (Smail3.1.28.1 #13) id m0rep3R-000oQCC; Wed, 15 Feb 95 20:06 MET Received: by pizza.franken.de (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.4) id ; Wed, 15 Feb 95 13:39 MET Received: (from scratchy@localhost) by vulcan.franken.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA00969; Wed, 15 Feb 1995 13:36:18 +0100 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 1995 13:36:18 +0100 From: Volker Paepcke Message-Id: <199502151236.NAA00969@vulcan.franken.de> To: gj@FreeBSD.org CC: brian@mediacity.com, questions@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (garyj@rks32.pcs.dec.com) Subject: Re: unpar'ed version of GDB 4.13 available? Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Cc: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Feb 95 12:36:52 GMT From: "gj%pcs.dec.com@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com" Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org > I'd like to install the UPS debugger under FreeBSD 2.0. > > It makes heavy use of (munges) the GDB 4.13 source code, and > it doesn't seem to work with the version of GDB 4.13 supplied > in the 2.0-FreeBSD release. > > Does the standard distribution of GDB 4.13 with FreeBSD support > exist some where? > > Has anyone already ported UPS to FreeBSD 2.0? > > Thanks, > > Brian Litzinger > brian@easynet.com I actually looked into this at Jordan's request and concluded that it would be more trouble than it's worth to modify ups to work with the version of gdb in -current. However, ups has been ported and the port includes all the diffs to stock gdb-4.13 to support ups and FreeBSD. What's missing is support for kernel debugging and attach/detach, but what the hey. There's a copy of the port on wcarchive as /incoming/FreeBSD/ups-port.tgz. I actually compiled it and it worked quite well, although I personally consider tgdb to be superior. Note that I didn't do this port, I just know about it. Gary J. Hi! I did the port and posted a message a few weeks ago. I had to make a clean port of gdb-4.13 to work with ups. Since I don't have many experiences with the gdb and its internals I don't know how to add kernel debugging and the attach/detach stuff. I even don't know if this will work with the ups stuff anyway, because I don't know absolutely nothing about its internels either. -- I'm working with this ups port and its working quite stable. I've seen many questions about a port of the ups debugger (because its really nice) that I think you can live with the lacking of some features :-) volker