From owner-freebsd-isdn Sat Jan 27 13:19:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.kdt.de (ns2.kdt.de [195.8.224.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9233F37B400 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:18:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from beverly.kleinbus.org (line0503.kdt.de [213.240.146.3]) by smtp.kdt.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA15804; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:18:44 +0100 Received: by beverly.kleinbus.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id CBBB170; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:17:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:17:37 +0100 From: Ignatios Souvatzis To: Gerald Heinig Cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about FRMR transmit, although docs say not to Message-ID: <20010127221737.C1588@beverly.kleinbus.org> References: <3A7338BE.FA7EC4B9@post.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A7338BE.FA7EC4B9@post.rwth-aachen.de>; from Gerald.Heinig@post.rwth-aachen.de on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:08:14PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:08:14PM +0100, Gerald Heinig wrote: > Hi there, > This has me puzzled, since if you don't transmit a certain frame at any time (according to the state machine > definition), you can't expect to receive it! Uhm, wait. - You can expect to have equipment working according to older (or newer) protocol versions - hm, is the protocol symmetric at that level at all? If not, the other side might well be allowed to send that. Regards, -is To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message