From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 24 15:11:05 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8966516A41A;
	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org)
Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (thingy.kcilink.com [74.92.149.59])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767FB13C457;
	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org)
Received: from [192.168.7.121] (host-121.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.121])
	by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024EDC943A;
	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:11:03 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <63204462-6FCE-41AA-89C9-A16707A6A971@khera.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:11:02 -0400
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Cc: freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman
	server daemon
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:11:05 -0000

Hi... Sorry I've been out of the loop for a while.

Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new  
port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER.  It just seems  
wrong to do that.

Furthermore, since this port replaces devel/p5-gearmand, it should  
have either been repo-copied, or moved, or some such, and appropriate  
entries in UPDATING created so that the various ports tools can  
follow the move.