From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  4 14:41:00 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A73106566B
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 May 2012 14:41:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF888FC08
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 May 2012 14:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q44EekcY006443;
	Fri, 4 May 2012 16:40:46 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q44EekTg006440; Fri, 4 May 2012 16:40:46 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 16:40:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
In-Reply-To: <482299836.184445.1335872251190.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205041640060.6437@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <482299836.184445.1335872251190.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Fri, 04 May 2012 16:40:46 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFS - slow
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 14:41:00 -0000

> Probably not. NFSv4 writes are done exactly the same as NFSv3. (It changes
> other stuff, like locking, adding support for ACLs, etc.) I do have a patch
is there any chance to improving it? i mean to cluster writes up to 
MAXBSIZE on nfs server, just like local UFS do?