From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Oct 12 14:17:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BCA37B503 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id XAA21499; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:17:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA64104; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:17:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:17:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Terry Lambert Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf In-Reply-To: <200010120136.SAA12021@usr09.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [snip] Well put. > So, any objection to: > > The people who want it, write the code to make it an > option that is off by default, so that the rest of > the world who hates the idea can ignore it. None whatsoever. This actually sounds like a good idea to me, and I'd like to see this discussion moving towards a way to do this, rather than a grand display of our varying POVs on this matter. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message