From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 11:04:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547CA16A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:04:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from poison2.syncrontech.com (adsl-nat.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870B243D54 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:04:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from guinness.syncrontech.com (guinness.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.57])j0AB4bqI065489; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:04:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from coffee (coffee.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.37]) j0AB4bG3077765; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:04:37 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Message-ID: <028201c4f704$3002db80$2508473e@sad.syncrontech.com> From: "Ari Suutari" To: "Achilleus Mantzios" , "Joris Verschoor" References: Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:04:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-7"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FW: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:04:48 -0000 Hi, > Without having gone thru any details, > is really a company prohibited from using FreeBSD with jdk14 > for its internal applications? I think that also internal deployment requires passing of TCK and paying roalties to SUN. It is all in the license text. > > Is a web hoster prohibited from selling FreeBSD accounts > with jdk14 installed? > Same as internal use :( See attachments "C" and "D" in license. I'm not a lawyer, but I have spent several hours reading the license text. I don't know if the text was similar in previous version, the one I have been studying is from jdk 1.4.2. I hope I got it wrong, but it looks a little like if you are going to do anything else than just playing around you need to get into agreement with sun yourself (this means passing TCK, also maybe some royalties) or use binary release (which is older version, 1.3) or use linux-jdk. I think that I'm going to take the last option for production use. (until there is a binary 1.4 jdk for FreeBSD) Ari S.