From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 15 13:48:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA08299 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 15 Mar 1998 13:48:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from elvis.vnet.net (elvis.vnet.net [166.82.1.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA07770; Sun, 15 Mar 1998 13:46:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hajime@vnet.net) Received: from katie.vnet.net (hajime@katie.vnet.net [166.82.1.7]) by elvis.vnet.net (8.8.8/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA25852; Sun, 15 Mar 1998 16:47:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (hajime@localhost) by katie.vnet.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA06015; Sun, 15 Mar 1998 16:47:26 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: katie.vnet.net: hajime owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 16:47:25 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Hodges To: Ted Spradley cc: Colin Eric Johnson , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Free Unix Users of New Mexico Subject: Re: Trouble with kernel from FreeBSD-stable (2.2.6-beta?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Ted Spradley wrote: > > > > On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Colin Eric Johnson wrote: > > > > I'm using the same config file that I used with the 2.2.5-release source > > > and that kernel works just fine. When I build the kernel and boot I get > > > the following: > > > > > > the kernel is labeled: 2.2.6-beta #0 > > > > > > > Rebuild the kernel before you reboot. > > A bit late for that advice now. But Mr. Johnson said he had built a kernel. > He didn't say that he rebuilt /sbin/mount. Perhaps that's the problem. Yes Ted, that's why my message included these two lines before the ones you qouted from me: >Make sure you have cvsup'ed recently. >Then be sure to make world. :-) > > > > I am unclear why this is wd0s2a instead of wd0s1a if the latter is really > > your root partition. > > There has been a great deal of discussion on this list in the last few days > about this of-by-one error. It boils down to: a) the slice number is one > greater than it should be. b) don't worry about it. c) it will be fixed > soon, but it's not as easy as it might seem. Thanks for the summary, Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message